|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 18:48:52 GMT -5
Raps get
Marvin Williams Wizards 2012 1st round pick
Mavs get
Raps 2014 1st round pick Martell Webster Luke Schenscher
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 18:50:13 GMT -5
Mavs will reply later...had class...pfff, class...who actually goes these days?
|
|
MavsGM
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 354
|
Post by MavsGM on Jan 31, 2006 20:25:55 GMT -5
Mavs agree after a wild and exciting class lol. This trade gets me more youth and talent at SF with A potential. Schenscher gives me some much needed depth underneath the hoop.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 20:55:18 GMT -5
Um this deal sucks too.
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 20:58:23 GMT -5
Downgrade at sf? Martell has better ratings overall and A potential...Duncan will be gone by 2014, so the pick could be whatever.
All of a sudden, people are having problems with trades? Funny.
|
|
GMHornets
All BBS Team
New Orleans Hornets
The Actual Commish
Posts: 1,051
|
Post by GMHornets on Jan 31, 2006 20:59:00 GMT -5
I'd call Marvin to Martell quite an upgrade actually.
|
|
Lakers GM
All BBS Team
Los Angeles Lakers
Posts: 1,747
|
Post by Lakers GM on Jan 31, 2006 20:59:48 GMT -5
What's Martell's D at SF?
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 21:00:31 GMT -5
What's Martell's D at SF? Lowest would be B+. I havent played him there so I cant say for sure.
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 21:02:42 GMT -5
And this years draft is basically a two man draft. Outside of that there doesnt appear to be anything special(currently 5th pick).
Mountian out of a mole hill.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 21:04:41 GMT -5
Downgrade at sf? Martell has better ratings overall and A potential...Duncan will be gone by 2014, so the pick could be whatever. All of a sudden, people are having problems with trades? Funny. I deleted my post. Martell has very nice ratings, but has done nothing sim wise. IMO Marvin sims as well if not better then Martell, and in that scenario I wouldnt add a lotto pick with Marvin to get Martell. All potential is scouted, so I dont know why that plays into anyones thoughts when it comes to trades. Especially for a player that has been in the league as long as Martell. Wiz pick is top 6 right now, which is quite good. I have problems when trades are bad, this isnt a new thing.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 21:05:39 GMT -5
The chances of your pick being bad because of TD being gone is laughable. Im sure Felton, Williams, Beasley and JBC will be just fine.
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 21:06:59 GMT -5
My record without Duncan is .500 or slightly better.
We as GMs base decisions on scouted potential etc. Its all we have.
That first Atlanta deal was far worse and it passed...
Both sides are getting assets in this trade...and most would vote Martell has having higher value, with the exception being you of course.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 21:10:01 GMT -5
My record without Duncan is .500 or slightly better. Im assuming if TD was no longer on your club, youd make deals to fix the weakness youd have inside. As opposed to when hes injured and you replace him with your current backups.
|
|
Lakers GM
All BBS Team
Los Angeles Lakers
Posts: 1,747
|
Post by Lakers GM on Jan 31, 2006 21:11:33 GMT -5
Look, all I'm saying is, this deal should pass as long as I get Beasley for Woodson. I say we implement talent-sharing. Deal.
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jan 31, 2006 21:12:00 GMT -5
So now its a "bad" trade because I might be able to do something to improve my team down the road?
Like, seriously man...
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 21:12:59 GMT -5
So now its a "bad" trade because I might be able to do something to improve my team down the road? Like, seriously man... No I think its a bad trade for Dallas because you get more talent them him. Like, seriously man.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 21:17:47 GMT -5
Also another example of trading a guy, without making a trade block first.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on Jan 31, 2006 21:31:17 GMT -5
trade in
|
|