Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on May 9, 2005 14:35:03 GMT -5
Each team has 1 offer per year, and can only offer that after the All-Star break. This not only saves time for the council, but allows the league to have a free agency period in the offseason.
So in summary...
Starting next year.....
You only get 1 extension offer....
and you can only offer after the All-Star break
|
|
|
|
Post by manasrai on May 9, 2005 14:37:26 GMT -5
be wise and make it a good offer...cuz if its rejected you're simply outa luck.
|
|
|
|
Post by SoonerfanTU on May 9, 2005 15:11:41 GMT -5
One per player?
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on May 9, 2005 15:39:25 GMT -5
One per team.
You get one chance to extend one player. If you cant do that then the player goes to free agency.
Remember, FBB doesnt have a way to do in season extensions, so even the one offer is more then youd get in a normal league.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Pink Panther on May 9, 2005 16:02:06 GMT -5
I can see a mixed reaction to this... but lets face it, free agency period just got a whole lot better.
|
|
SpursGM
All BBS Team
San Antonio Spurs
Posts: 1,036
|
Post by SpursGM on May 9, 2005 17:27:23 GMT -5
couldn't agree more with this.
|
|
rommie
Starter
Boston Celtics
Posts: 814
|
Post by rommie on May 9, 2005 21:26:34 GMT -5
I think this is actaully a good idea.
It sure will make free agency alot better. Also should actually limit the overpaid players, since you can only extend one player per season starting next year.
I think it also really makes GMs think about who is important to their team and who isn't.
Just one question, will you guys take into account greed, play for a winner, and loyalty ratings too? I'm just curious.
|
|
Scrub
Posts: 0
|
Post by on May 9, 2005 22:48:06 GMT -5
Just one question, will you guys take into account greed, play for a winner, and loyalty ratings too? I'm just curious. Market value, playing time, winning team are our top priorities. |
|
